Family phone agreement template: what the free ones leave out
The honest comparison
Two free family agreements exist, from organisations with more authority than any paid guide, and this page is not going to pretend otherwise.
| Template | What it is | What it does not contain |
|---|---|---|
| National PTA, The Smart Talk (with Norton) [S160] | "A free tool that helps families set digital safety ground rules together": five discussion topics, then "Download, print, or email your finished agreement" [S160] | Any device-level step: no Screen Time or Family Link configuration, no app-by-app instruction. It produces the conversation and the pledge only. |
| Common Sense Media, Family Media Agreement [S161] | A free two-page fill-in PDF of reciprocal pledges: "I will take care of the device I'm using", "I will not share my passwords with anyone other than my family", "I will help my family set media time limits that make sense" [S161] | Numbers, phone-specific rules, and any configuration: it covers "media" broadly, with blank checkboxes, and the family still invents the actual limits and does the setup alone. |
The objection to any of this is on the record, and it is fair: "I know plenty of people take the view that it's better to educate your child on acceptable use rather than lock down their devices" [S025]. The kit's answer is that the agreement is half of it and the settings are the other half, and that parents arrive at the same rules on their own: "Phones only charge in the kitchen. No phones in bedrooms" [S016]; "Phone overnight outside the bedroom" [S122]. The US regulator says the same three things in its own first-phone guidance: require permission for downloads, agree when and where the phone is used, and plan for loss or theft [S018].
What a pledge without settings costs
| Approach | Cost | What tends to happen |
|---|---|---|
| Free template, signed, no settings | $0 | The pledge says "I ask before I install"; nothing on the phone enforces it, and the first argument is about a download |
| Settings, no agreement | $0 or a subscription | The child experiences rules they never agreed to; the first bypass is treated as betrayal because nothing was written down in advance |
| Free template plus the settings done from Apple's and Google's own pages | $0 and an evening of reading | Works, if you find the right order on both platforms and test it; the kit is that reading, done and cited |
| The First Phone Kit | $27, once | The agreement with each line mapped to a setting, UK and US versions, plus the setup and the test |
What you'll have when you're done
- A one-page agreement, UK or US version, filled in and signed by both of you the same evening the phone was set up.
- Every line on it matched to a setting that actually enforces it, or to a fact the platform itself states [S101][S013][S260][S261][S253].
- The school's own phone rules written in, in the school's words [S014].
- The IMEI and the loss plan on the same page, before it is needed [S279][S018].
- A review date in the calendar, next to the monthly settings recheck.
The ten lines, and what each one maps to
TL;DR
- Use the free templates if a pledge is all you want [S160][S161]. They are good.
- The kit's ten lines each map to a setting or a platform's own statement, not to a wish.
- Three decisions to settle out loud first: open or covert, what you can actually see, and what happens the first time a rule is broken.
- Sign it the same evening. A week later it is a punishment; the same night, it is the deal.
First, three things to settle out loud
- Open or covert. Both positions are on the record: ConnectSafely says "Except in very rare situations, we at ConnectSafely don't recommend using stealth mode", and named academics warn constant surveillance is not developmentally healthy [S239][S235][S320]. The kit picks for nobody. The agreement has a line for whichever you chose.
- What you can actually see. Apple tells children a parent "can't read your messages or listen to your conversations" [S260]; Meta states a supervising parent cannot read the messages but can see who the teen messaged in the past seven days [S261]; Snapchat's Family Center does not show the content of private conversations [S253]. Do not promise less monitoring than you have, or claim more.
- What happens the first time a rule is broken, decided now. One view on the record, offered as a household option and not as guidance: Dr. Steiner-Adair, quoted by the Child Mind Institute, "You don't have to take the whole phone away"; remove the app that was involved instead [S280][S283].
The ten lines
- Downloads. "I ask before I install anything." Maps to Ask to Buy on iPhone, where "If you decline the request, no purchase or download will take place" [S101], and to app approval in Family Link [S013]. The free templates have the promise; the phone has the switch.
- When. The hours on school days and at weekends. Maps to Downtime and App Limits [S012] or Daily limit and Weekly schedule [S013].
- Where. Where the phone charges overnight, and that it does not come into the bedroom [S016][S122].
- School. The school's own phone rules, in writing, applying as well as this agreement, not instead of it [S014].
- What we share. Full name, school, address, phone number, daily routine and location are never shared online, and a new app or game needs a parent check first [S286][S018].
- What my parent can see. Open or covert, ticked, with the detail written in the platforms' own terms [S260][S261][S253].
- If something goes wrong. The child can tell a parent about anything on the phone without losing the phone for telling them. Every late-discovery story in the kit's sources is a story about this line being missing.
- If a rule is broken. Decided in advance, while nobody is angry [S280][S283].
- If the phone is lost or stolen. IMEI written on the page; call the network or carrier with the account and the IMEI, give the police the IMEI, change the passwords the phone could reach [S279][S018].
- The parents' side. The rules about mealtimes and bedrooms apply to the adults in the house too.
Two versions, UK and US, differing in the official pages they point to: the ICO Children's Code and the Online Safety Act collection [S028][S254], or the FCC's first-phone guidance and the FTC on children's privacy [S018][S019]. Named and linked, interpreted by nobody. It is a household document, not a legal contract.
The hard part: what an agreement cannot do
It cannot make a setting hold. "There are limitations to parental controls. They're not perfect - children can bypass them if they're clever enough," the NSPCC's Luke Savage told The Guardian [S283]. That is why line 8 exists, and why the kit's checklist has a monthly test next to the review date.
It gives no behavioural guidance. If phone use in your house has become a source of real conflict, or you are worried about your child's wellbeing, that belongs with your GP, the school's pastoral or safeguarding lead, or a qualified counsellor. The agreement organises the household's own decision. Nothing in it is clinical or therapeutic advice.
And it is not the free templates' fault that they stop at the pledge. That is their scope [S160][S161]. This kit's scope is the pledge plus the phone, and if you only need the first half, you already have it for free.
Questions parents actually ask
Should I just use the free PTA or Common Sense template?
If a signed pledge is all you want, yes. The Smart Talk is "a free tool that helps families set digital safety ground rules together" across five discussion topics, with a printable agreement at the end [S160]. Common Sense Media's Family Media Agreement is a free two-page fill-in PDF of reciprocal promises [S161]. Both are good at what they do. Neither contains a device-setup step, a phone-specific rule, or a number.
What does the kit's agreement have that they don't?
Ten lines that each map to something real: line 1 matches the app-approval setting on the phone [S101][S013]; line 4 folds in the school's own phone rules [S014]; line 6 records what the parent can actually see, using the platforms' own words [S260][S261][S253]; line 9 is the lost-or-stolen plan with the IMEI [S279][S018]; line 10 applies the rules to the adults too. UK and US versions.
Can I see it before buying?
The free 4-page preview shows one full step with its sources, not the agreement itself. The agreement's ten line headings are listed on this page in full, so you can compare before paying anything.
Is it a legal contract?
No. It is a household document, and nothing in the kit interprets any law. The official pages are named and linked so you can read them yourself: the FCC's first-phone guidance and the FTC on children's privacy for the US [S018][S019], the ICO Children's Code and the Online Safety Act collection for the UK [S028][S254].
Is this a subscription?
No. The First Phone Kit is a one-time $27 purchase, and the agreement is one of ten files in it, alongside the iPhone and Android setup, the checklist, and the sources file.
Price, and what this doesn't cover
One-time purchase. No subscription, no recurring charge.
The First Phone Kit: both platforms, screen by screen, tested, with the signed agreement.
Sources (dated, checked 2026-09-09; markers like [S012] match the kit's own sources file)
- [S012] Apple Inc., 2026-07-01: support.apple.com/en-us/108806
- [S013] Google, not dated: support.google.com/families/answer/7101025?hl=en
- [S014] Tom's Guide, 2025-08-17: www.tomsguide.com/phones/buying-your-kid-their-first-phone-do-these...
- [S016] Mumsnet, 2023-12-11: www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/4961251-childs-first-m...
- [S018] Federal Communications Commission, 2025-11-25 (page's own "updated" date): www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/your-kids-first-phone
- [S019] Federal Trade Commission, 2025-09-03: www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/privacy-security/childrens-privacy
- [S025] Reddit r/Parenting, 2025-11-21: www.reddit.com/r/Parenting/comments/1p35fz2/suggestions_for_restric...
- [S028] Information Commissioner's Office, 2020 (code's own publication year; the page itself is undated at re-check on 2026-09-09): ico.org.uk/for-organisations/uk-gdpr-guidance-and-resources/childre...
- [S101] Apple, 2026-07-01: support.apple.com/en-us/105055
- [S122] Reddit r/ScienceBasedParenting, not dated: www.reddit.com/r/ScienceBasedParenting/comments/1ky7a22/any_rules_f...
- [S160] National PTA with Norton, The Smart Talk, co-created 2015, redesigned 2022; read 2026-09-09: thesmarttalk.org/
- [S161] Common Sense Media, Family Media Agreement (PDF), 2018 (footer copyright); read 2026-09-09: www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/featured-content/files...
- [S235] NYT Wirecutter, 2026-08-18: www.nytimes.com/wirecutter/reviews/how-to-introduce-technology-to-k...
- [S239] ConnectSafely, 2025-07-20: connectsafely.org/controls/
- [S253] Snapchat, not dated: parents.snapchat.com/family-center
- [S254] UK Government, not dated: www.gov.uk/government/collections/online-safety-act
- [S260] Apple Inc., 2026-07-01: support.apple.com/en-us/119854
- [S261] Meta Newsroom, 2024-09-17: about.fb.com/news/2024/09/instagram-teen-accounts/
- [S279] TCL Electronics Global, 2025-11-29: www.tcl.com/global/en/blog/tips/how-to-block-a-stolen-phone
- [S280] Child Mind Institute, author JoJo Marshall, 2026-03-02: childmind.org/article/when-should-you-come-between-a-teenager-and-h...
- [S283] The Guardian, author Amy Fleming, 2025-03-16: www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2025/mar/16/how-tech-experts-keep-...
- [S286] National Cybersecurity Alliance, 2026-08-24: www.staysafeonline.org/articles/family-tech-rules-we-think-you-shou...
- [S320] Devorah Heitner, not dated: courses.devorahheitner.com/